The latest version of Byteman (1.1.1) has just been released and it includes the first batch in a series of sample Byteman scripts, all of which provide examples of how to monitor different aspects of JVM operation. The scripts inject tracing code into different JVM classes so that you can watch the JVM as it starts or stops threads, opens sockets, closes files, finalizes instances etc.
Seeing these scripts at work can be very educational -- for example, runnning up the JBoss App Server with script ThreadMonitor.txt installed I could see exactly which threads are created, started and stopped during AS bootstrap.
The script only needs 3 simple rules:
########################################################################
#
# Rule to trace thread creation
#
RULE ThreadMonitor trace create
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD <init>
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT EXIT
IF TRUE
DO traceCreate($0)
ENDRULE
########################################################################
#
# Rule to trace thread start
#
RULE ThreadMonitor trace start
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD start
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT EXIT
IF TRUE
DO traceStart($0)
ENDRULE
########################################################################
#
# Rule to trace thread exit
#
RULE ThreadMonitor trace exit
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD exit
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT ENTRY
IF TRUE
DO traceExit($0)
ENDRULE
The first rule is injected into the constructor for
java.lang.Thread
, the second into Thread.start()
and the third into Thread.exit()
. The conditions are all TRUE
because we want to see every call in the trace output. The rule actions call built-in methods traceCreate(Thread)
, traceStart(Thread)
and traceExit(Thread),respectively
. The argument to these calls, $0
, is the thread object which is the target of the method invocation which triggers the rule, i.e. the one being created, started or exited. The built-in methods access this object to identify the thread's name and it's class name.The implementation of the three trace methods is provided by a custom HELPER class, ThreadMonitorHelper, which specialises the library class StackTraceHelper provided in the sample lib jar. There is nothing special about this class -- it does not need to use Byteman library code to do its job. It is just a POJO which wraps up the code needed to print meaningful trace with a neat, simple API. All three methods print a line of text identifying the thread event (create, start or exit), thread name and thread class. The first two also use methods inherited from
StackTraceHelper
to look down the stack for the frame from which new Thread()
or Thread.start()
was called and print the details of the calling method.Here's a sample of the output when running JBoss AS with these rules installed:
starting server default
=========================================================================
JBoss Bootstrap Environment
JBOSS_HOME: /home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT
JAVA: /usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14/bin/java
JAVA_OPTS: -Dprogram.name=run.sh -server -Xms600M -Xmx600M -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Djava.compiler=NONE -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005 -Dorg.jboss.byteman.quodlibet -javaagent:/home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar=listener:true,boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar,boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/lib/byteman-sample.jar,script:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
CLASSPATH: /home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/bin/run.jar:/usr/java/jdk1.6.0_14/lib/tools.jar
=========================================================================
*** Thread create JDWP Transport Listener: dt_socket java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
Listening for transport dt_socket at address: 5005
*** Thread create JDWP Event Helper Thread java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
*** Thread create CompilerThread0 java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
*** Thread create CompilerThread1 java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
*** Thread create Low Memory Detector java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
*** Thread create main java.lang.Thread
from org.jboss.Main.main at Main.java:719
*** Thread start main java.lang.Thread
from org.jboss.Main.main at Main.java:719
*** Thread exit main java.lang.Thread
*** Thread create DestroyJavaVM java.lang.Thread
from VM runtime
*** Thread create Thread-1 java.util.logging.LogManager.Cleaner
from java.util.logging.LogManager$Cleaner.<init> at LogManager.java:200
*** Thread create Thread-2 org.jboss.Main.ShutdownHook
from org.jboss.Main$ShutdownHook.<init> at Main.java:883
12:38:16,588 INFO [JBossASServerImpl] Server Configuration:
Bootstrap URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/conf/bootstrap.xml
JBOSS_HOME URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/
Common Base URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/common/
Common Library URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/common/lib/
Server Name: default
Server Base URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/
Server Library URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/lib/
Server Config URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/conf/
Server Home URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/
Server Data URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/data/
Server Log URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/log/
Server Temp URL: file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/tmp/
*** Thread create Thread-3 java.lang.Thread
from org.jboss.bootstrap.impl.base.server.AbstractServer.start at AbstractServer.java:350
*** Thread start Thread-3 java.lang.Thread
from org.jboss.bootstrap.impl.base.server.AbstractServer.start at AbstractServer.java:352
12:38:16,590 INFO [AbstractServer] Starting: JBoss Server[6.0.0.SNAPSHOT (build: SVNTag=JBoss_6.0.0-SNAPSHOT date=r93729)]
12:38:17,344 INFO [AbstractMCServerBase] Starting Microcontainer, Main bootstrapURL=file:/home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/conf/bootstrap.xml
*** Thread create Thread-4 java.util.TimerThread
from java.util.TimerThread.<init> at Timer.java:456
*** Thread start Timer-0 java.util.TimerThread
from java.util.Timer.<init> at Timer.java:154
12:38:18,259 INFO [VFSCacheFactory] Initializing VFSCache [org.jboss.virtual.plugins.cache.CombinedVFSCache]
12:38:18,262 INFO [VFSCacheFactory] Using VFSCache [CombinedVFSCache[real-cache: null]]
12:38:18,670 INFO [CopyMechanism] VFS temp dir: /home/adinn/jboss/jbossas/trunk/build/output/jboss-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/server/default/tmp
12:38:18,675 INFO [ZipEntryContext] VFS force nested jars copy-mode is enabled.
*** Thread create Thread-5 java.util.TimerThread
from java.util.TimerThread.<init> at Timer.java:456
*** Thread start ZipFile Lock Reaper java.util.TimerThread
from java.util.Timer<init> at Timer.java:154
During this initial stage of bootstrap most of the threads are created by the VM itself. The first one actually created and started by the AS is identified by the following lines:
*** Thread create main java.lang.ThreadThe trace shows that the name of the newly created thread is
from org.jboss.Main.main at Main.java:719
*** Thread start main java.lang.Thread
from org.jboss.Main.main at Main.java:719
*** Thread exit main java.lang.Thread
main
and it is an instance of class java.lang.Thread
. It is created and immediately started by a call to Thread.start()
in method org.jboss.Main.main
at line 719 of file Main.java
. Here's the actual code:The third trace line is a little confusing. The thread which has exited is not actually the JBoss main thread just created. It is in fact the parent thread, created by the VM and also called
701 Runnable worker = new Runnable() {
702 public void run()
703 {
. . .
716 };
717
718 ThreadGroup threads = new ThreadGroup("jboss");
719 new Thread(threads, worker, "main").start();
main
. The JBoss main thread goes on to create a whole lot of other threads, connection handlers, pool threads and so on.Clearly, there are lots of possibilities for developing alternative scripts which provide different, more interesting tracing behaviour. The other scripts in the samples directory provide further simple examples of how you might instrument other JVM classes to provide runtime trace. By coding more selective rule conditions or more complex rule sets it is possible to make the tracing much more fine-grained and specific to particular circumstances. Adding more actions, possibly using other custom helper classes, would allow a variety of different statistics to be gathered and displayed.
I will explain next how you set up your program to inject these rules. The trace above shows Byteman injecting the scripted rules from program start. However, when it comes to tracing execution it would be nice if it were possible to start up your program without any scripts installed and then switch on tracing by loading and unloading rules as needed. Well, of course, it is possible to do just and I'll go on to explain what you need to change to achieve that too.
First off let's run through how JBossAS was configured to start up the byteman agent and execute this script from JVM bootstrap. All that is needed is to supply the java command which starts the JBossAS Main class with a
-javaagent
argument. Passing this argument to JBossAS is most easily achieved by inserting it into environment variable JBOSS_OPTS
ans the running the normal JBossAS startup script.The actual setting required was displayed in one of the very long lines of trace output:
JAVA_OPTS: -Dprogram.name=run.sh -server -Xms600M -Xmx600M -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Djava.compiler=NONE -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=5005 -Dorg.jboss.byteman.quodlibet -javaagent:/home//byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar=listener:true,boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar,boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/lib/byteman-sample.jar,script:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=trueLet's look at the actual -javaagent argument to understand what is needed to point the agent at the script and the relevant libraries. To make it a bit easier to see what is going on I have added line breaks after the equal sign and commas which separate the different options. In reality the argument needs to be supplied as one long string with no spaces or line breaks.
-javaagent:/home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar=Before we look at these options in detail I'll also point out that the
listener:true,
boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar,
boot:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/lib/byteman-sample.jar,
script:/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt
java
command line included the following property setting-Dorg.jboss.byteman.quodlibetThis property enables injection into java.lang classes. Normally the agent ignores rules which apply to this package on the grounds that by modifying these classes it will likely shoot itself in the foot changing the JVM functionality it relies on to execute rules. Setting this flag tells it to remove this restriction. There is no great harm in trying this but beware! Get your rules wrong and you will probably see a JVM error such as a stack overflow.
Ok, warnings aside let's return to the
-javaagent
argument. The first value following the -javaagent: prefix is the location of the byteman jar. If BYTEMAN_HOME
identifies the directory into which the release has been installed then the library is located in $BYTEMAN_HOME/lib/byteman.jar
, in this case /home/adinn/byteman/install/lib/byteman.jar
.The
=
sign following the jar file name is used to separate it from the agent options which configure various aspects of the agent's behaviour. Where more than one option is supplied then they must be separated using commas. The options provided in this case include a script:
option. This points the agent at the script file containing rules which trace thread activity. You can provide multiple script:
options if you want to inject several sets of rules. For example, you might also want to use the ClassLoadMonitor script to monitor class loading. The agent options list also contains two boot:
options which supply jars to be added to the bootstrap classpath (we'll come to this later) and a listener:
option which is used to start the agent listener.The first option is
listener:true
. This causes the agent to start a listener thread which can be communicated with using the submit.sh
script located in the Byteman bin directory. The submit script allows you to manage the rule base at runtime. You can check which rules have been injected, compiled and executed. You can also load and unload rules while the program is running, including loading updated versions of rules to fix errors or patch the rule behaviour. The listener will not be started if listener:false
is provided or if the listener option is omitted.So, if you want to be able to switch tracing on and off you must provide option
listener:true
. If not then you cannot add or remove any rules and you will be stuck with whatever rules were loaded at boot time. You can, of course, omit the script:
option. It's ok to start with a vanilla JVM. If you do this then you can load the rules later when you want to turn tracing on.Let's take a closer look at the submit script. Running submit.sh with no arguments lists all the currently installed rules:
[adinn@toby trunk]$ $BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.shThe output shows each of the 3 rules which were in the original script and shows that they have been injected into class java.lang.Thread loaded by the bootstrap class loader (it actually says
# File /home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt line 66
RULE ThreadMonitor trace start
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD start
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT EXIT
IF TRUE
DO traceStart($0)
ENDRULE
Transformed in:
loader: sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@480457
trigger class: java.lang.Thread
compiled successfully
# File /home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt line 52
RULE ThreadMonitor trace create
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD <init>
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT EXIT
IF TRUE
DO traceCreate($0)
ENDRULE
Transformed in:
loader: sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@480457
trigger class: java.lang.Thread
compiled successfully
# File /home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt line 80
RULE ThreadMonitor trace exit
CLASS java.lang.Thread
METHOD exit
HELPER org.jboss.byteman.sample.helper.ThreadMonitorHelper
AT ENTRY
IF TRUE
DO traceExit($0)
ENDRULE
Transformed in:
loader: sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@480457
trigger class: java.lang.Thread
compiled successfully
sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@480457
but no other classloader will load this class). The last line of output for each rule indicates that the rule was parsed and type-checked successfully.Running the submit script with the -u flag causes the rules to be unloaded:
[adinn@toby trunk]$ $BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh -u \
$BYTEMAN_HOME/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt
uninstall RULE ThreadMonitor trace create
uninstall RULE ThreadMonitor trace start
uninstall RULE ThreadMonitor trace exit
[adinn@toby trunk]$ $BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh
no rules installed
The agent responds to the uninstall request by removing any rules defined in the supplied scripts (n.b. if
submit.sh -u
is run with no script arguments it removes all rules). The agent recompiles the methods of any affected classes to remove the injected trigger code. In this case the rules only apply to class Thread so only one class needs to be recompiled. When submit completes the Thread methods will have reverted to operating as they would do normally and no more trace will be generated. So, tracing has been switched off.The rules can be reinstated by resubmitting the script:
[adinn@toby trunk]$ $BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh \The agent handles an install request by identifying all classes to which the rules apply and recompiling them, injecting the newly uploaded trigger code. In this case the only class affected is Thread so its methods are recompiled inserting trigger code for the tracing rules once again.
$BYTEMAN_HOME/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt
install rule ThreadMonitor trace create
install rule ThreadMonitor trace start
install rule ThreadMonitor trace exit
If an uploaded rule has the same name as one that is currently loaded then the old trigger code is removed and new code injected. So, the submit script can be used to modify injected rules on the fly. If your rule shows something interesting and you want to see more details then just redefine and upload your trace rules to print out more details.
In other cases uploaded rules may not match any currently loaded classes. However, they are still added to the agent's rule base. The rule code will be injected when a class is loaded to which the rule applies.
Ok, finally, let's return to the
boot:
options provided as part of the -javaagent
argument. The options are used to ensure that the two jar files are available when the trigger/rule code are type-checked and compiled.The first jar to consider is the sample library
/home/adinn/byteman/install/sample/lib/byteman-sample.jar
which contains the implementation of the helper classes StackTraceHelper
and ThreadMonitorHelper
. When the rules are injected these classes need to be available in the JVM classpath or else the rule code will fail to typecheck and compile.Normally, it would be sufficient to place the samples library jar in the runtime classpath provided on the java command line. Once this is done it does not usually matter what classloader the trigger class is loaded by since the system classloader is normally a parent for it. So, when type checking the injected rule the helper class will be found by delegation. As an alternative, the agent option
sys:
can be used to append the jar file to the system classpath. This also ensures the helper classes will be found by delegation.The only problem with this is that the rules in the thread monitor script need to be injected into JVM classes. These classes are loaded by the bootstrap loader. Unfortunately, the system classloader is not a parent loader for the bootstrap loader -- in fact, the parent relationship is the other way round. Adding the sample library jar to the bootstrap classpath means that it is visible when injecting into JVM classes. Hence, we need to supply the
boot:
option for this jar.If you didn't install your helper jar at boot time then you could always use submit.sh to install it at runtime. As long as you have started the listener you can call
submit -s my.jar
or submit -b my.jar
to add a jar to, respectively, the system classpath or bootstrap classpath. Obviously, you need to do this before you load any rules which refer to the helper classes. Unfortunately, there is no way to remove jar files once they have been added in this way.The other jar supplied using the
boot:
option is the byteman jar itself. The reasoning here is much the same -- the agent classes need to be visible to bootstrap classes. Normally, when the agent jar is installed its classes get loaded by the system classloader. However, in this case we want to inject a trigger call into a JVM class. If the agent classes such as Rule etc are loaded by the system classloader then they will not be visible from classes such as Thread. So, we also need to supply the boot:
option for the byteman jar.Note that it is not possible to add the byteman jar to the bootstrap classpath using submit. By the time the listener is up and running some agent classes will already have been loaded into the system classloader. Trying to install the byteman jar into the bootstrap classpath at this point will send you straight to classloader hell.
So, let's recap. If you want to start the agent so you can load and unload scripts at runtime and inject into any class, including JVM classes, you need to set
export BJAR=$BYTEMAN_HOME/lib/byteman.jarand then run your java command with arguments
-javaagent:$BJAR=listener:true,boot:$BJAR
-Dorg.jboss.byteman.quodlibetWhen you want to start tracing (firsttime only) you install your helper jar using
$BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh \You can then load your script using command
-b $BYTEMAN_HOME/sample/lib/byteman-sample.jar
$BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh \To check that your rules have been injected and compiled use command
$BYTEMAN_HOME/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt
$BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.shTo stop tracing you unload the script using
$BYTEMAN_HOME/bin/submit.sh -u \
$BYTEMAN_HOME/sample/scripts/ThreadMonitor.txt
9 comments:
This is awesome - very concise but detailed enough to get someone up and running. I plan on finding time to play with this and perhaps integrate it somehow into RHQ. This can enable our management platform to perform some remote debugging on any managed JVM. Again, nice job on this stuff.
Hi--probably a question you get a lot, but how does Byteman compare to Btrace (http://kenai.com/projects/btrace), which also provides for dynamic instrumentation and monitoring?
Thanks
Patrick
Patrick,
BTrace was one of the two projects which inspired me to develop Byteman (the other, obviously, being AOP). BTrace is very like Byteman in that it can inject side effects into any code, including after the code has already been loaded. Also, like Byteman and unlike AOP, BTrace has a very WYSIWYG model for how you define the side effects. You provide a bit of Java code and point to where you want it to be inserted and BTrace makes sure it gets called. The big difference is that BTrace very tightly circumscribes the nature of those side effects, ensuring that they cannot change the computational state or control flow of the application. Byteman imposes no such restriction.
The example in this blog shows Byteman being used as a tracing/monitoring tool. However, Byteman is also a testing tool which enables fault injection and management of subsequent fault propagation. Rules can call arbitrary Java code and change the state of runtime and application objects. For example, in the DO clause of the first rule, it would be possible to call $0.setPriority() supplying a random value for the priority of the Thread just created. Combining this with a suitable condition would allow you to downgrade the priority of a whole suite of JVM or application threads.
Rules can also change the control flow of an application. If the DO clause ends with a THROW or RETURN action then, assuming the rule fires, the trigger method into which the rule is injected is immediately short-circuited, throwing an exception or returning a result to its caller.
Clearly, this is a very powerful but also a potentially hazardous capability. The reason it is needed is that when testing you often want to perturb the behaviour of the application in a controlled way. Byteman allows you to do exactly this in a clear, precise and targetted fashion. You provide a set of rules which describe exactly which side effects need to be installed and when they should be executed. Using the standard built-in operations you can easily design rule sets which determine how each such effects should propagate across calls and between threads. Rules can also be used to trace execution and validate the outcome of tests.
Most importantly, this process is minimally invasive. It guarantees to test the original application modulo only the specific places in the code where you have injected rule code. You don't have to rewrite or stub code or provide mock objects in order to do this.
I intend to provide further samples in later Byteman releases (and probably another accompanying blog post) which explain how you can use Byteman to rig up test scenarios and expose application defects. For now, you can see a simple, albeit slightly artificial, example in my talk from this year's Jazoon conference. Also, take a look at the user guide to see some of the standard built-in operations Byteman provides to support fault injection testing.
John,
Thanks for the feedback and thanks for doing a great job with your prototype RHQ plugin.
For those curious what Andrew is talking about re: my RHQ plugin prototype - I posted a blog entry myself on Byteman and this Byteman RHQ plugin.
Hi Andrew,
Having a bit of a problem with this version 1.1.1. It complains about my binding( BIND rzv1...). Here is my rule script. Any help will be much appreciated :
RULE readfield
CLASS fi.tapiola.tita.jay.byteman.Counter
METHOD inc()
AFTER READ fi.tapiola.tita.jay.byteman.Counter.cnt
BIND rzv1 : String = $0.getClass().getName()
# Match the 2nd parameter to the THREAD_COUNT variable defined in CounterTest class. It says the num. of threads that should
# meet at the rendezvous point
DO System.out.println("At rendezvous point: " + rzv1 + ", cnt=" + $this.cnt),
createRendezvous(rzv1, 20),
rendezvous(rzv1)
ENDRULE
The class Counter is :
package fi.tapiola.tita.jay.byteman;
public class Counter {
public int cnt = 0;
public void inc() {
cnt = cnt + 1;
}
}
Thanks.
cheers,jay
Hi Jay,
I think the problem is not your BIND clause, rather the lack of an IF clause in your rule. The BIND is optional but the IF is not. Try this
RULE readfield
CLASS fi.tapiola.tita.jay.byteman.Counter
METHOD inc()
AFTER READ fi.tapiola.tita.jay.byteman.Counter.cnt
BIND rzv1 : String = $0.getClass().getName()
# Match the 2nd parameter to the THREAD_COUNT variable defined in CounterTest class. It says the num. of threads that should
# meet at the rendezvous point
IF TRUE
DO System.out.println("At rendezvous point: " + rzv1 + ", cnt=" + $this.cnt),
createRendezvous(rzv1, 20),
rendezvous(rzv1)
ENDRULE
regards,
Andrew Dinn
-----------
Hi Andrew,
Yes, that was it. Thanks, it worked.
Excellent library this byteman.
I was using IBM's ConTest before this and found that to be an
excellent one too. The only problem
is that it is too expensive and does
not give the user the wider
functionality and control.
Keep up the good work :)
cheers,
jay
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your positive feedback and also for the tip regarding ConTest. I'll take a look at it (if nothing else just to see how much I am undercutting their business ;-).
By the way, I have now started posting Byteman-specific posts to the Byteman project blog so as to avoid cluttering the TS blog with non-TS related stuff. You might like to take a look at it:
http://bytemanblog.blogspot.com/
regards,
Andrew Dinn
Post a Comment